Yuku free message boards

I plan to yes,

I live in central Europe but UpNorth. We ahve same time as Bruxelles and Paris I guess. anybody knows what 10PM EST could be over here then? would it it 5 or 6 or 7 hours?

The Earth turns ...

naah I am not good at logic and we have the Summer time corrections to take care of too.

I listen to BBC and they are two hours less than the Summertime?

when we have 10PM European Standard Time then it is 8PM Gmt or UTC if I get it. Could anybody confirm?

What would ti be in 10PM EST then?

02.00AM Friday the 28 of May?

Bernt nto logical enough indeed.

Help me out pleawe and what is the url to the different place the chat is to take place. I am no chatter but like to be present there too.

I want to ask him about reactions to the Vincent Sarich page 11 thing about God in our heads.

Very few atheists seem to take it as intended by Sarish?

Bernt

sorry me being soo wordy.

1. help me find correct local time to chatt.

now it is 20:51European standard time.
Most likely it is 18:51 UTC or Gmt. Not sure.

what local time for me wil the chat be?
10PM EST is what in GMT or UTC?

2. The chat is not the usal one. another url how do I find it then?

Bernt.

Thanks Nicole for the link it appear to be 04:00 AM which suits me better than 6 PM EST cause that would then be 00:00AM European Central time? or 12:00 PM which is not a good time for me personally It is 11:30 soon now and I am to otired t othink straight. 04. am would be bettr if I go to bed at about 10PM local time. 6 hours of sleep

Ok I try to use the chat link Chris refered to then. Last time there was two different but I try both so one have to be the right one

If I fail, could any of you ask him my question? sorry me beign soo selfcentered.

I have wordered about it since first hearing about it.

Page 11 in "How We Believe" refer to that the gods within the believers head is acted uon and thus seem to ahve political power.

I find this to be very true from a practical perspective.

But to my surprize, almost no atheist or freethinker see this as a viable or valueable perspective. Many just dis it as a trivial thign while I see it as a way forward. An approach that has something going for it. If I get it, this is the "real" god cause this is the god they act upon. The God Creator or the Philosophical God is how they describe it apologethically but the acted upon god is the one in the believers head.

That one "exists" if only socially as a construct.

So ask Shermer (if I fai lto get there) what reactions he gets from readers on this issue. How does audiences take it up with him. Enthusiastically or very skeptically or are al ljust dissing it as a trivial perspective. No big deal attitude?

Very important to me, but I try to be there but has no way fo formulating this one short and to the point. I am not good at being consistant. sadly.

ok time for bed.

Bernt