So, here's a spot to do so.
Loricat's Book Nook
Celebrating the Absurd
| Author | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Loricat |
Personal Reactions |
Lead | ||
|
Posts: 600 04/17/07 10:55:54 OMG I'm Awesome! |
I'm finding that I want get personal with this book. Every page has something that makes me think about my life, my practices...or makes me want to rant.
So, here's a spot to do so. "All beings are the owners of their deeds, the heirs to their deeds."
Loricat's Book Nook Celebrating the Absurd |
|||
|
|
||||
Loricat |
Re: Personal Reactions | #1 | ||
|
Posts: 600 04/17/07 10:58:41 OMG I'm Awesome! |
So, this morning I was sitting in Tim Horton's reading the first chapter with my morning coffee, and these two guys started to wash the windows outside. It was poetry in motion -- "Wow!" I thought to myself, "Such efficiency!" Then I stopped, making the connection -- efficiency has always been something I admired. Where did that come from in my life?
"All beings are the owners of their deeds, the heirs to their deeds."
Loricat's Book Nook Celebrating the Absurd |
|||
|
|
||||
irishrosem |
Re: Personal Reactions | #2 | ||
|
Posts: 641 04/17/07 16:16:08 OMG I'm Awesome! |
Loricat: Every page has something that makes me think about my life, my practices...or makes me want to rant.
That's funny, I'm finding it very hard to personally relate to McKibbin's particulars. From the lack of community interaction he's depicted, to the lost family ties, to the use of radio, I don't encounter the issues I've read about thus far. The fact that I don't recognize the loss of community that McKibbin's describes makes me wonder if that is necessarily a product of economic expansion. Or could it be that economic expansion merely paralleled a breakdown in community, rather than causing it? If this is possible, shouldn't we consider directing efforts at strengthening community rather than in retarding economic expansion, in the hopes that this will strengthen communities. In truth, I am happy that I am able to find and interact with very different communities. The only thing that seems relevant to my life so far is the chapter on food-but after reading The Omnivore's Dilemma, there wasn't much new material there for me. Loricat: efficiency has always been something I admired. I also admire, and strive for, efficiency-and I don't think that will ever be anything I try to eliminate from my life. Though efficiency in the extreme may be detrimental to society, I see value in certain forms of efficiency. |
|||
|
|
||||
Dissident Heart |
Re: Personal Reactions | #3 | ||
|
Posts: 1868 04/17/07 17:37:56 Indisputable BookTalk Master |
loricat: I'm finding that I want to get personal with this book. Every page has something that makes me think about my life, my practices...or makes me want to rant.
I think McKibben is certainly pushing the reader to personalize the challenges he sets forward with his narrative: how do I respond to the growing economic disparity, ecological devastation, social deterioration and personal malaise described in the book? How does my life (consumption habits, career, political affiliations, entertainment choices, modes of transportation, community involvement, personal beliefs, relationships) exacerbate these problems and how does it lead toward some kinds of solutions? I think the weakest part of McKibben's argument involves the third rung of his thesis: a growing economy does not guarantee an increase in personal happiness. I think it is weakest because of the subjective nature of the topic. Still, McKibben provides a variety of data, cross-cultural and across time, that certainly supports his thesis. More stuff does not always make us happy. Perhaps I'm already inclined to believe that, thus making his examples all the more persuasive. I think the ecological component of his argument is strongest. The planet cannot sustain the current trajectory of economic growth. We simply cannot afford to continue our relationship with fossil fuels (coal, oil, and natural gas) without committing irreparable damage to the biosphere. Our current economic system is inextricably bound to fossil fuels: something has got to give. What am I willing to change? I think McKibben's argument regarding the decline of happiness is strongest when tied to the increase of ecological disaster. irishrose: shouldn't we consider directing efforts at strengthening community rather than in retarding economic expansion, in the hopes that this will strengthen communities. If economic expansion means more equals better, more reliance on fossil fuels, greater distance from food source to dinner plate, more behemoth agribusiness conglomerates, then I think we are weakening communities. I think we need intelligent economics, not economic expansion. We need localized, community centered economic systems that utilize the very best agricultural sciences, and foster genuine democratic participation and accountability. |
|||
|
|
||||
RaulRamos |
Efficiency | #4 | ||
|
Posts: 28 04/23/07 12:43:14 Looks like I'm a regular now! |
Quote: So do I. Quote: Efficiency needn't be associated with cost in that you can define the limit you want to produce and then devote the time/energy/money gained to pursuit other interests, like reading non-fiction books and sharing ideas with others. Apart from that I found myself reflected when the author describes utility getting out of control. I have the impression that, when speaking about consumer habits, the science of economics has concentrated to much on description: the consumer behaves like this, so to optimize capital flux an economic system must work like that, whereas I see the necessity of developing ways to teach consumers they can act better, more responsibly. We read every day about IQ and emotional intelligence, perhaps it is time we started improving 'consumer intelligence'. |
|||
|
|
||||
garicker |
Re: Personal reactions | #5 | ||
|
Posts: 262 04/25/07 14:02:35 Smarty Pants |
I'm about halfway through the book and, so far, I'm underwhelmed.
McKibben is a lively writer, most of the time, but his analysis seems awfully superficial for a book titled Deep Economy. There's really not much here that's new. It ought not come as a surprise to anyone that gluttony is a bad thing or that there are more important things in life than collecting more toys. Consider these lines from William Wordsworth, written in 1807, The world is too much with us; late and soon, Getting and spending, we lay waste our powers; Little we see in Nature that is ours; We have given our hearts away, a sordid boon! Kind of sums it all up, doesn't it? Two centuries ahead of time. I enjoyed McKibben's chapter "The year of eating locally," but I get the impression from comments of others that it may be mostly because I haven't yet read The Omnivore's Dilemma. That's not to say I regret reading the book, and, as noted, I'm only about halfway through. I guess I was just hoping for more. George "Godlessness is not about denying the existence of nonsensical beings. It is the starting point for living life without them."
Godless in America by George A. Ricker |
|||
|
|
||||
irishrosem |
Re: Personal reactions | #6 | ||
|
Posts: 641 04/25/07 15:36:05 OMG I'm Awesome! |
Garicker: I'm about halfway through the book and, so far, I'm underwhelmed.
Ditto. Garicker: There's really not much here that's new. It ought not come as a surprise to anyone that gluttony is a bad thing or that there are more important things in life than collecting more toys. And because I am a product of this mentality, having been raised in a household that placed very little value on possessions, there's hardly anything new for me here, so far. I get the idea that McKibben presents ideas he perceives to be unordinary (extraordinary), but they aren't new to me or most of the people with whom I choose to associate. About a week ago I put the book down halfway through Chapter 4. I picked it up again today. Perhaps I'll finish it shortly; but, so far, I have very little to comment on. |
|||
|
|
||||
Loricat |
Re: Personal reactions | #7 | ||
|
Posts: 600 04/30/07 09:31:29 OMG I'm Awesome! |
So far, not much new, I agree. But I am appreciating the point of view of the economists he's quoting, and the various tidbits of facts.
"All beings are the owners of their deeds, the heirs to their deeds."
Loricat's Book Nook Celebrating the Absurd |
|||
|
|
||||
riverc0il |
Re: Personal reactions | #8 | ||
|
Posts: 447 05/02/07 20:59:51 Witty&Wise |
That's funny, I'm finding it very hard to personally relate to McKibbin's particulars. From the lack of community interaction he's depicted, to the lost family ties, to the use of radio, I don't encounter the issues I've read about thus far. The fact that I don't recognize the loss of community that McKibbin's describes makes me wonder if that is necessarily a product of economic expansion. Or could it be that economic expansion merely paralleled a breakdown in community, rather than causing it? If this is possible, shouldn't we consider directing efforts at strengthening community rather than in retarding economic expansion, in the hopes that this will strengthen communities. In truth, I am happy that I am able to find and interact with very different communities.
Not reading the book, but wanted to jump in here with a book recommendation. If you are interested in pursuing the idea of the break down of community, Putnum's "Bowling Alone" is an excellent and worth while read. Putnum quantifiably demonstrates the break down of community in America with surprising and somewhat helpless reasons why it has occurred. I would love to see this book and topic expanded on as we continue to see "community" shift from the real world to online. I spend a significantly higher amount of time on online communities than real world neighborhood communities. |
|||
|
|
||||
Loricat |
Re: Personal reactions | #9 | ||
|
Posts: 600 05/04/07 09:22:22 OMG I'm Awesome! |
Rivercoil: I spend a significantly higher amount of time on online communities than real world neighborhood communities.
How do you feel about that? Some online communities can be very supportive, but others... "All beings are the owners of their deeds, the heirs to their deeds."
Loricat's Book Nook Celebrating the Absurd |
|||
|
|
||||
riverc0il |
Re: Personal reactions | #10 | ||
|
Posts: 447 05/05/07 07:47:17 Witty&Wise |
How do you feel about that? Some online communities can be very supportive, but others...
Online "communities" are really not even a close substitute for the real thing. Unless you get to know people from the online forum in person, but even in that case the scope of the online forum does not truly match what a real community offers each other. At least I do not feel it is a legitimate substitution as I long to have the type of community I once had (college, living with a big group of people vs. one person, groups and activities I no longer belong to, etc.). There is certainly the potential to develop some sort of community online. But out of all the forums I participate in, I have found the greatest community with people I have met off line to pursue our shared interests in person. |
|||
|
|
||||
Loricat |
Re: Personal reactions | #11 | ||
|
Posts: 600 05/07/07 09:19:49 OMG I'm Awesome! |
Thanks for the answer...There was such a neutrality to your earlier comment, I was wondering if you valued online communities over real ones.
I'm thrilled that the last couple of weeks, after we've been here for a year, my husband has finally connected to some people in town, and is starting to make friends. Whew!! "All beings are the owners of their deeds, the heirs to their deeds."
Loricat's Book Nook Celebrating the Absurd |
|||
|
|
||||
riverc0il |
Re: Personal reactions | #12 | ||
|
Posts: 447 05/07/07 20:41:13 Witty&Wise |
I tend to enjoy making neutral comments at times
This is mostly due to the nature of the region to which we moved. Northeastern Vermont is generally small town based in which everyone knows each other due to families and schools taking such a big part of everyone's lives. When kids graduate from high school or college, they either decide to get married and have kids or more to Burlington or some other city outside of Vermont. Often times those emigrants come back to the area when they want to have kids. This means that most people our age (late 20s) either left the area or have kids and structure their lives around kids. Complicating the issue is the ironic fact that most people that live in the mountains do not partake in outdoor recreation (except for the kids' sports activities or dog walking!). I have found age and common interests to be a huge social barrier to connecting with a community. As much as I long for that community connection, I am content not to pursue having children to attain it So online communities seem to partially fill a void with like minded folks involved in similar pursuits, hobbies, passions, outdoors activities, etc. But certainly does not substitute the experience of knowing your neighbors and having some folks to hang out with and keep up on local happenings which is missing from our lives. Even though I am not participating in this reading, I would like to address that McKibben lives in Vermont and probably bases many of his community ideas on the Burlington area. I love Burlington. Having lived in Massachusetts for so long, I consider Burlington a little slice of Cambridge, MA in Vermont. Many also call the city the People's Republic of Burlington which only adds flavor to the comparison. Burlington is an ideal town for many Deep Economy ideas. Without having read the book, I suspect that the idea of "local currency" may have some basis on Burlington's system of local based currency (from what I understand, it hasn't worked out so well). I think it may be a good idea to read McKibben with the perspective of the location McKibben is writing from. Buying local produce is damn easy around here because everyone has a garden. The local weather forecast on our state's NPR station is always keeping folks posted of frost warnings and other such crop issues. Any ways, without having done to much looking into this title, the basis for my suggestion is limited, but I would imagine many of these community building local economy issues would be ideally suited for some areas and totally anathema in others based on local culture. |
|||
|
|
||||
Loricat |
Re: Personal reactions | #13 | ||
|
Posts: 600 05/08/07 08:51:18 OMG I'm Awesome! |
Tough situation, socially. The optimist in me wants to say "But surely there's someone, somewhere?!?"
Interesting things, potential friends. One never knows where they hide. When we moved here, I had the leisure (and the personality) that allowed me to network my way into a few good friendships. My husband wasn't so lucky. He started playing poker in a free tournament on a weekly basis, and I met a couple of guys I tried to hook him up with, 'cause they played poker too. But then, my husband got into amateur theatre about 3 months ago, and now he's got some good buddy-ships developing. I had an epiphany the other day (can an atheist have an epiphany? "All beings are the owners of their deeds, the heirs to their deeds."
Loricat's Book Nook Celebrating the Absurd |
|||
|
|
||||
riverc0il |
Re: Personal reactions | #14 | ||
|
Posts: 447 05/08/07 22:06:01 Witty&Wise |
Totally agree with the poker story. It is an activity that allows people to come together and social but probably is not building many strong social connections. On a similar note, I am a die hard skier. Online communities have allowed me to network, meet, and ski with several other die hards. This has been excellent as the chances of meeting a fellow skier with similar high level ability that charges the terrain I love has been slim to none over the past years as a solo skier. So we plan a few trips, have an awesome day together for seven hours, then go our separate ways. No contact at all during the "off months." So big difference between activity partners and true social networking and community networks. I think the latter involves more partnership and working on a shared commitment. When I used to play trumpet in various bands for example, those organizations had some of the strongest ties between people I have ever been part of.
To the point of McKibben's book, without having read the book, I am sure the issue of communal living is likely addressed and this would be another way of building community in a society dedicated to removing connections. When I lived at College years back, the sense of community living with seven other guys was intense and I still miss it though not something I would want at this point |
|||
|
|
||||
Loricat |
Re: Personal reactions | #15 | ||
|
Posts: 600 05/14/07 09:56:05 OMG I'm Awesome! |
Rivercoil: When I lived at College years back, the sense of community living with seven other guys was intense and I still miss it though not something I would want at this point.
That's a point he makes in the book -- that most people with college backgrounds refer to those years as the best of their lives...because of the community (and the [perceived] freedom from cares, bills, responsibility...) But, do we have the time for as many friends now as we did then?!? "All beings are the owners of their deeds, the heirs to their deeds."
Loricat's Book Nook Celebrating the Absurd |
|||
|
|
||||
Dissident Heart |
Re: Personal reactions | #16 | ||
|
Posts: 1868 05/17/07 10:21:48 Indisputable BookTalk Master |
rivercoil: So online communities seem to partially fill a void with like minded folks involved in similar pursuits, hobbies, passions, outdoors activities, etc. But certainly does not substitute the experience of knowing your neighbors and having some folks to hang out with and keep up on local happenings which is missing from our lives.
Welcome back rivercoil, it's good to see you in the mix again. McKibben makes the point in Ch. 4 "The Wealth of Communities", that living in community is living with other people's interests: people who don't always share your tastes and proclivities...having to make space for different experiences and attitudes...tolerating a diverse array of wants and desires. He makes the point in the context of community radio where different musical genres, lifestyles, activities, events fill a public airway, allowing the listener to encounter a community much larger than her own particular tastes and inclinations. Community means (among other things) living with people different than me. Part of what happens with on-line communities is a type of self-selection where like minded folk who generally share the same interests and concerns gather to enjoy their commonalities...they reinforce, reassure, remind one another of what it is they like and want from the world of art, music, experiences, books, ideas, etc.. On-line communities also allow for an anonymity that reduces accountability. A crucial component to McKibben's thesis is that local economies and participatory communities provide a thicker layer of accountability: I am known by those I do business with, and I know the ones who do business with me. We are not faceless, nameless, impersonal things: but flesh and blood persons with families living in communities where actions impact actual people in real ways. |
|||
|
|
||||
Loricat |
Re: Personal reactions | #17 | ||
|
Posts: 600 05/18/07 08:59:35 OMG I'm Awesome! |
Dissident Heart -- I agree with your comment on the self-selecting aspect of Internet communities. It really is a place that a group of people who are passionate about collecting staplers can get together and talk about staplers, at any time of the day, not just at their annual conventions (I know that people do collect staplers, I hope I'm joking about the conventions!
But I think the real life/Internet communities intersect a lot more, and accountability can mean a lot on the Internet. Look at Booktalk.org -- people are welcoming to new individuals, but one's identity here is stronger, and clearer, the more consistent one is in responses...the less anonymity one maintains. And in real life, it is easy (-ish) to find a group of like-minded individuals to share interests with. [Keep in mind that I'm a 90% real life person -- the only online communities I maintain are Booktalk.org and a small circle of blogosphere buddies. I'm just arguing for the sake of arguing... "All beings are the owners of their deeds, the heirs to their deeds."
Loricat's Book Nook Celebrating the Absurd |
|||
|
|
||||
Dissident Heart |
Re: Personal reactions | #18 | ||
|
Posts: 1868 05/23/07 14:56:43 Indisputable BookTalk Master |
Loricat: But I think the real life/Internet communities intersect a lot more, and accountability can mean a lot on the Internet. Look at Booktalk.org -- people are welcoming to new individuals, but one's identity here is stronger, and clearer, the more consistent one is in responses...the less anonymity one maintains.
I think McKibben tries to make the point that the Internet will be a very valuable tool in bringing local economies into contact across great distances... without the detrimental force of a centralized body of decision makers who are neither connected nor accountable to the communities upon which their decisions are inflicted. In other words, the Internet will allow for a vibrant exchange of ideas and recipes from across the planet, providing exciting opportunities for cross-pollination. The risks of community based, local economies includes parochialism, zenophobia, religious chauvenism, cultural superiority, and the the regurgitation of limited ideas and practices...the Internet can, and does, provide an anarchic and decentralized influx of information and practices that will provide a constant flow of challenging stuff for any status quo. Still, there is a more fundamental democratic nutrient that is delivered by way of face to face, person to person, flesh to flesh contact...I believe...that solidifies relationships of mutual accountability and participatory planning: the virtual solidarity of the Internet is, as I see it, only useful as far as it actually delivers the stuff of flesh and blood contact between people who's identities and ecosystems are known and shared. |
|||
|
|
||||
JulianTheApostate |
Liked the book | #19 | ||
|
Posts: 254 05/27/07 20:11:21 Smarty Pants |
I just finished the book and thought it was a pretty good. After reading your more critical opinions, I feel like I should explain why.
Even though I'd seen some of the ideas before, McKibben did a good job of tying them together: economics, the environment, and community. The way he framed his perspective had merit and introduced some subtleties. Still, I wasn't super-enthusiastic about the book. I probably won't recommend it to my wife. |
|||
|
|
||||
Dissident Heart |
Excellent | #20 | ||
|
Posts: 1868 06/27/07 12:20:59 Indisputable BookTalk Master |
I think the book was excellent and recommend it to anyone serious about building sustainable economies, functional communities and individual lives worth living. I wish every elected official would read it and ask themselves if their legislative and executive agendas support a Deep Economy...and if not, explain why the hell not. I think High School Seniors and Undergrads should read it and begin the process of asking "Who am I and what do I want for my life" with the principles of Deep Economics guiding these existential probings. Tied to this is the essential role of education for deep economy that must take place in schools. Curriculum needs to bring the student back again and again to the question: how does this information, project, activity help to build a sustainable economy, functional community, and increase individual happiness? Parents need to understand how they manage their households and in what ways their values and practices inculcate the next generation of producers and builders...and Deep Economy is an excellent resource for making sense of those issues.
|
|||
|
|
||||